- A new study found that only 9% of traded reptile species have some level of protection under CITES, the global wildlife trade convention, which could allow for the overexploitation of wild populations.
- It also found that about 90% of traded reptile species had at least some individuals originating from the wild rather than captivity, and that newly described species often appeared in the trade within a year of studies identifying these species were published.
- The authors of the study are advocating for a reversal in the CITES process to only allow the trade of certain species and ban the trade of all other species.
In 2019, conservation scientist Alice Hughes traveled to Geneva to attend a meet for the Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species ( CITES ), a multilateral agreement aimed to protect endangered wildlife and plants by either ban or limiting their external trade. When members proposed giving security to respective species of asian songbirds and tropical fish, which were heavily traded as exotic pets, these proposals were denied, Hughes said. rather, the focus remained on more charismatic, “ high-value ” animals .
“ In both cases, it was said to be excessively expensive to list that number of species, which basically got me thinking, ‘ Well, if these species that are clearly under significant terror from trade are not being covered, how many early species that are in trade are [ not being covered ] ? ” Hughes told Mongabay .
These concerns prompted Hughes and two colleagues, Benjamin Marshall and Colin Strine, to undertake a discipline on the ball-shaped wildlife trade, focusing specifically on reptiles, to understand how unregulated and under-regulated trade can affect wild populations. The results were published death calendar month in Nature Communications .
“ Reptiles were ideal as only 9 % were monitored by CITES and much of the trade is on-line, ” Hughes said.
The researchers gathered data from three chief sources : the CITES trade portal, wildlife meaning records from the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service ’ s Law Enforcement Management Information System ( LEMIS ) database, and an on-line webscrape of reptile retailers that looked at 25,000 webpages based on keywords in five languages .
They found that between 2000 and 2019, closely 4,000 reptile species were caught up in the trade, including many endangered, critically endangered and range-restricted species, vitamin a well as species without population data or conservation assessments. If a species is not protected under CITES or other international auspices measures, its trade is completely legal .
The study found that about 90 % of traded reptile species had at least some individuals coming from the raving mad, and that about 55 % of traded reptile individuals originated from the wild rather than enslavement. For lizards, 75 % were found to be taken from the angry, according to the study. It besides indicated that newly discovered species were appearing for sale on-line concisely after they were identified in publish studies .
“ I knew that species descriptions were being used to identify species that could be potentially fresh pets, but we found over 130 species described since 2000 they were already in trade with some of them in trade the same class they were described, ” Hughes said. “ We were astonished because, of course, these species have no baseline rule. ”
Sandra Altherr, co-founder of ProWildlife, a german animal social welfare and species protection group, said the findings of this study were not unexpected, as ProWildlife has besides found that the majority of traded reptile species are not covered by external protection measures .
“ But what surprised us is the huge number of species Marshall and his colleagues recorded, ” Altherr told Mongabay in an e-mail. “ about 4,000 reptile species in the pet trade is a shocking result, particularly when you have in mind that most of them are not covered by CITES and hence exploitation of wild populations is neither regulated nor even recorded. CITES is a helpful creature to limit trade wind in threaten species but the process is besides decelerate to combat the huge numbers of endanger non-CITES species and the trade dynamics, which is permanently shifting to new species. ”
Hughes said she and her colleagues are advocating for a reversal of the CITES regulation process : alternatively of allowing species to be freely traded until they are given protection under CITES, they want CITES to generate a list of species that can be legally traded, and for the deal of all other species to be banned .
“ adenine farseeing as we have a arrangement where you have to wait for a CITES regulation to say it can ’ t be traded [ or ] it can be traded, we ’ rhenium going to have unsustainable exploitation, ” Hughes said. “ What we need to have is CITES defining a list of species that can be traded, be it coming from enslavement, or the wild. ”
“ We fully support the authors stopping point and recommendation that a about-face of the status-quo would be needed, requiring proof of sustainability before deal is permitted, ” Altherr said. “ Field herpetologists fear to publish localities of new species, as those could be immediately targeted by collectors — long earlier CITES could react and long before other protection measures could be installed. ”
Marshall, B. M., Strine, C., & Hughes, A. C. ( 2020 ). Thousands of reptile species threatened by under-regulated ball-shaped trade. Nature Communications, 11 ( 1 ). department of the interior : 10.1038/s41467-020-18523-4
Banner image caption: A newly described Cyrtodactylus species from Myanmar that cursorily entered the ball-shaped pet trade. double by Benjamin Marshall.
Read more: How to Know a Frog’s Gender
Elizabeth Claire Alberts is a staff writer for Mongabay. Follow her on Twitter @ECAlberts.
FEEDBACK: Use this form to send a message to the author of this post. If you want to post a public gloss, you can do that at the bottom of the page .